Texas A&M Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
78.8
Composite Rank: #15  •  10–2 (FBS games)
GC Score
75.7
#16 in FBS
GC Net
+26.7
Raw GC Net
GC Off
48.2
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
21.5
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
81.9
#14 in FBS
MC Net
+0.58
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.17
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 UTSA H W 42–24 84.8 7.6 +77.2 81.1% 85.6%
2 Utah State H W 44–22 90.7 4.9 +85.8 87.7% 91.6%
3 Notre Dame A W 41–40 19.2 53.2 -33.9 37.1% 2.4%
5 Auburn H W 16–10 89.1 8.3 +80.8 79.3% 95.1%
6 Mississippi State H W 31–9 55.2 18.7 +36.5 68.2% 50%
7 Florida H W 34–17 82.8 7 +75.8 83.4% 96.3%
8 Arkansas A W 45–42 83.3 8 +75.3 83.3% 92.3%
9 LSU A W 49–25 59.7 18.1 +41.6 67.9% 53.2%
11 Missouri A W 38–17 77 9.3 +67.8 76.8% 73.7%
12 South Carolina H W 31–30 18.6 64.6 -46 29.5% 10.6%
13 Samford H 99.3 0 +99.2 99.9% 100%
14 Texas A L 17–27 22.1 43.9 -21.7 38.1% 9.2%
1 Miami HPost L 3–10 23.1 36.3 -13.2 48.9% 10.2%
10W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 UTSA H W 42–24 0.92 0 +0.92 1 0 ✓ +1
0.92
2 Utah State H W 44–22 0.38 0 +0.38 2 0 ✓ +2
0.19
3 Notre Dame A W 41–40 3.83 3.83 +0 1 1 Tied
1
5 Auburn H W 16–10 2.42 0 +2.42 1 0 ✓ +1
1
6 Mississippi State H W 31–9 3.81 0 +3.81 2 0 ✓ +2
1
7 Florida H W 34–17 3.9 0 +3.9 2 0 ✓ +2
1
8 Arkansas A W 45–42 3.4 1.7 +1.7 2 1 ✓ +2
1
9 LSU A W 49–25 2.3 2.3 +0 1 1 Tied
1
11 Missouri A W 38–17 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
12 South Carolina H W 31–30 5.91 1.97 +3.94 3 1 ✓ +3
1
14 Texas A L 17–27 2.55 5.1 -2.55 1 2 ✗ 1
1
1 Miami HPost L 3–10 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
10W / 12G 16 6