Temple Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
29.7
Composite Rank: #126  •  4–7 (FBS games)
GC Score
25.9
#114 in FBS
GC Net
-36.9
Raw GC Net
GC Off
13.8
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
50.8
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
33.5
#132 in FBS
MC Net
-2.54
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.21
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
50%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Massachusetts A W 42–10 63.5 19.5 +44 71.6% 59.6%
2 Howard H 94.6 2.9 +91.7 92.8% 96.2%
3 Oklahoma H L 3–42 4.3 91.1 -86.7 10.9% 0%
4 Georgia Tech A L 24–45 4.3 93.2 -88.9 10.8% 0%
6 UTSA H W 27–21 33.2 46.8 -13.6 46% 24.8%
7 Navy H L 31–32 57.4 19 +38.4 64.5% 54.2%
8 Charlotte A W 49–14 70 9.7 +60.3 75.9% 60.2%
9 Tulsa A W 38–37 52.7 21.2 +31.5 58.5% 43.5%
10 East Carolina H L 14–45 7.4 85.2 -77.8 18.4% 0%
11 Army A L 13–14 18 45.3 -27.3 38.6% 0.8%
13 Tulane H L 13–37 7.4 85.4 -78 18.5% 0%
14 North Texas A L 25–52 4.6 90 -85.4 11.4% 0%
4W / 11G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Massachusetts A W 42–10 0.03 0 +0.03 2 0 ✓ +2
0.01
3 Oklahoma H L 3–42 0 10.43 -10.43 0 4 ✗ 0
1
4 Georgia Tech A L 24–45 0 6.65 -6.65 0 3 ✗ 0
1
6 UTSA H W 27–21 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.92
7 Navy H L 31–32 0.59 0.59 +0 1 1 Tied
0.59
8 Charlotte A W 49–14 0.02 0.02 +0 1 1 Tied
0.02
9 Tulsa A W 38–37 0 0.56 -0.56 0 1 ✗ 0
0.56
10 East Carolina H L 14–45 0.93 2.8 -1.87 1 3 ✗ 1
0.93
11 Army A L 13–14 0.57 0 +0.57 1 0 ✓ +1
0.57
13 Tulane H L 13–37 0 4.42 -4.42 0 4 ✗ 0
1
14 North Texas A L 25–52 0 2.6 -2.6 0 4 ✗ 0
0.65
4W / 11G 6 21