Syracuse Composite Control — 2025

Syracuse Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

32.6

Composite Rank: #121 • 2–9 (FBS games)

GC Score

20.8

#125 in FBS

GC Net

-43.5

Raw GC Net

GC Off

20.5

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

63.9

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

44.3

#119 in FBS

MC Net

-1.84

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.19

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Tennessee N	L 26–45	1.5	97.4	-95.9	3.7%	0%	—
2	UConn H	W 27–20	15.6	64.3	-48.6	32.2%	5.2%	—
3	Colgate H	—	93.5	3.4	+90.1	91.6%	94.7%	✓
4	Clemson A	W 34–21	89.5	6.7	+82.8	83.2%	91.4%	✓
5	Duke H	L 3–38	7.1	84.1	-77.1	17%	0.7%	—
6	SMU A	L 18–31	5.3	85.1	-79.8	13.3%	0%	—
8	Pittsburgh H	L 13–30	6.7	86.1	-79.3	16.8%	0%	—
9	Georgia Tech A	L 16–41	8.6	73.2	-64.6	17.8%	0%	—
10	North Carolina H	L 10–27	40.7	45.7	-5	45.1%	40.7%	—
11	Miami A	L 10–38	8.9	68.5	-59.6	22.2%	0%	—
13	Notre Dame A	L 7–70	1.4	98.2	-96.7	3.6%	0%	—
14	Boston College H	L 12–34	20.4	54.7	-34.3	34.7%	14.2%	—
2W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Tennessee A	L 26–45	0	2.12	-2.12	0	1	✗ 0	1
2	UConn H	W 27–20	0.8	0	+0.8	1	0	✓ +1	0.8
4	Clemson A	W 34–21	2.21	0	+2.21	1	0	✓ +1	1
5	Duke H	L 3–38	0	3.41	-3.41	0	2	✗ 0	1
6	SMU A	L 18–31	0	6.29	-6.29	0	3	✗ 0	1
8	Pittsburgh H	L 13–30	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
9	Georgia Tech A	L 16–41	0	6.65	-6.65	0	3	✗ 0	1
10	North Carolina H	L 10–27	0	2.69	-2.69	0	3	✗ 0	0.9
11	Miami A	L 10–38	0	6.93	-6.93	0	2	✗ 0	1
13	Notre Dame A	L 7–70	0	15.33	-15.33	0	4	✗ 0	1
14	Boston College H	L 12–34	1.26	2.53	-1.27	1	2	✗ 1	1
2W / 11G			—	—	—	3	20	—	—