SMU Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
82.1
Composite Rank: #13  •  8–4 (FBS games)
GC Score
76.3
#14 in FBS
GC Net
+27.5
Raw GC Net
GC Off
53.3
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
25.9
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
88
#7 in FBS
MC Net
+0.97
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.2
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
77.8%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 East Texas A&M H 99.4 0.2 +99.3 99.6% 100%
2 Baylor H L 45–48 64.6 12.9 +51.7 69.1% 61.2%
3 Missouri State A W 28–10 42.8 41.1 +1.7 52.7% 33.1%
4 TCU A L 24–35 10.1 79.6 -69.5 23.9% 0.6%
6 Syracuse H W 31–18 85.1 5.3 +79.8 86.7% 82.3%
7 Stanford H W 34–10 83.3 6.6 +76.7 83.5% 82.1%
8 Clemson A W 35–24 75.9 11.4 +64.5 71.5% 72.9%
9 Wake Forest A L 12–13 22.7 48 -25.3 39.9% 4%
10 Miami H W 26–20 20.4 41.8 -21.4 44.2% 5%
11 Boston College A W 45–13 86.9 7.5 +79.5 81.3% 89.9%
13 Louisville H W 38–6 91.7 4.9 +86.8 87.8% 94.6%
14 California A L 35–38 10.8 73.7 -62.8 21.7% 0.6%
1 Arizona NPost W 24–19 95.9 3.4 +92.5 91.5% 98.8%
8W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
2 Baylor H L 45–48 2.02 0 +2.02 1 0 ✓ +1
1
3 Missouri State A W 28–10 0.93 0 +0.93 2 0 ✓ +2
0.47
4 TCU A L 24–35 0 2.17 -2.17 0 1 ✗ 0
1
6 Syracuse H W 31–18 1 0 +1 3 0 ✓ +3
0.33
7 Stanford H W 34–10 2.11 1.05 +1.06 2 1 ✓ +2
1
8 Clemson A W 35–24 2.21 0 +2.21 1 0 ✓ +1
1
9 Wake Forest A L 12–13 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
10 Miami H W 26–20 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
11 Boston College A W 45–13 3.79 0 +3.79 3 0 ✓ +3
1
13 Louisville H W 38–6 5.76 0 +5.76 3 0 ✓ +3
1
14 California A L 35–38 2.14 1.07 +1.07 2 1 ✓ +2
1
1 Arizona HPost W 24–19 2.72 0 +2.72 2 0 ✓ +2
1
8W / 12G 19 3