Eastern Michigan Composite Control — 2025

Eastern Michigan Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

Composite Rank: #111 • 4–7 (FBS games)

GC Score

31.4

#105 in FBS

GC Net

-29.9

Raw GC Net

GC Off

20.6

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

50.5

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

44.6

#118 in FBS

MC Net

-1.83

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.37

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Texas State A	L 27–52	5.8	92.5	-86.7	14.5%	0%	—
2	Long Island University H	—	15.2	58.6	-43.3	37.7%	0.5%	—
3	Kentucky A	L 23–48	3.8	95.4	-91.7	9.4%	0%	—
4	Louisiana H	W 34–31	50	23.8	+26.3	62.6%	44%	—
5	Central Michigan A	L 13–24	6.2	90.3	-84.1	15.6%	0%	—
6	Buffalo A	L 30–31	36	21.6	+14.4	53%	24%	—
7	Northern Illinois H	W 16–10	51.4	18.3	+33	62.8%	44.9%	—
8	Miami (OH) A	L 30–44	6.3	86.7	-80.4	15.7%	0%	—
9	Ohio H	L 21–28	54.2	31.3	+22.9	56.7%	57.8%	—
11	Bowling Green H	W 27–21	51.9	20.6	+31.3	62.8%	44.2%	—
12	Ball State A	W 24–9	83.6	8	+75.6	80%	80.7%	✓
14	Western Michigan H	L 21–31	28.5	58.8	-30.3	34.5%	29.9%	—
4W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Texas State A	L 27–52	0	2.52	-2.52	0	3	✗ 0	0.84
3	Kentucky A	L 23–48	1.61	6.43	-4.82	1	4	✗ 1	1
4	Louisiana H	W 34–31	0.3	0	+0.3	1	0	✓ +1	0.3
5	Central Michigan A	L 13–24	0	0.47	-0.47	0	1	✗ 0	0.47
6	Buffalo A	L 30–31	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.5
7	Northern Illinois H	W 16–10	0.11	0	+0.11	1	0	✓ +1	0.11
8	Miami (OH) A	L 30–44	0	0.83	-0.83	0	2	✗ 0	0.41
9	Ohio H	L 21–28	0	0.7	-0.7	0	1	✗ 0	0.7
11	Bowling Green H	W 27–21	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.07
12	Ball State A	W 24–9	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.11
14	Western Michigan H	L 21–31	0	1.03	-1.03	0	3	✗ 0	0.34
4W / 11G			—	—	—	3	14	—	—