Clemson Composite Control — 2025

Clemson Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

Composite Rank: #36 • 6–6 (FBS games)

GC Score

61.4

#39 in FBS

GC Net

+8.4

Raw GC Net

GC Off

46.4

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

74.6

#36 in FBS

MC Net

+0.11

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.68

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

80%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	LSU H	L 10–17	43.2	31.7	+11.4	53.2%	40.5%	—
2	Troy H	W 27–16	36.5	51	-14.4	45.8%	30.2%	—
3	Georgia Tech A	L 21–24	18.2	55.7	-37.5	32.6%	0%	—
4	Syracuse H	L 21–34	6.7	89.5	-82.8	16.8%	0%	—
6	North Carolina A	W 38–10	94.7	3	+91.7	92.4%	93.5%	✓
7	Boston College A	W 41–10	86	6.2	+79.8	84.6%	82.4%	✓
8	SMU H	L 24–35	11.4	75.9	-64.5	28.5%	0%	—
10	Duke H	L 45–46	35.2	35.2	+0	52.8%	23.8%	—
11	Florida State H	W 24–10	92.4	4.7	+87.7	88.3%	96.1%	✓
12	Louisville A	W 20–19	30.4	40.7	-10.2	44.8%	10.5%	—
13	Furman H	—	96.1	2.5	+93.6	93.7%	98.1%	✓
14	South Carolina A	W 28–14	58.8	14.4	+44.4	64.5%	42.8%	✓
1	Penn State NPost	L 10–22	9.7	83.6	-73.9	24.4%	0%	—
6W / 12G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	LSU H	L 10–17	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
2	Troy H	W 27–16	2.47	0	+2.47	4	0	✓ +4	0.62
3	Georgia Tech A	L 21–24	0	4.44	-4.44	0	2	✗ 0	1
4	Syracuse H	L 21–34	0	0.33	-0.33	0	1	✗ 0	0.33
6	North Carolina A	W 38–10	1.79	0	+1.79	2	0	✓ +2	0.9
7	Boston College A	W 41–10	2.53	0	+2.53	2	0	✓ +2	1
8	SMU H	L 24–35	0	2.1	-2.1	0	1	✗ 0	1
10	Duke H	L 45–46	3.41	1.71	+1.7	2	1	✓ +2	1
11	Florida State H	W 24–10	3.07	0	+3.07	2	0	✓ +2	1
12	Louisville A	W 20–19	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
14	South Carolina A	W 28–14	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
1	Penn State HPost	L 10–22	0	2.6	-2.6	0	1	✗ 0	1
6W / 12G			—	—	—	12	6	—	—