Charlotte Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
22.8
Composite Rank: #133  •  0–11 (FBS games)
GC Score
0
#137 in FBS
GC Net
-70
Raw GC Net
GC Off
5.9
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
75.9
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
45.7
#115 in FBS
MC Net
-1.76
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.16
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
When winning MC
MC > GC by 46 points. Charlotte generated strong consecutive scoring sequences (Momentum Control score: 45.7) but spent more time in contested win probability territory than their sequence count suggests (Game Control score: 0). This profile suggests a team that delivers explosive scoring runs but also plays in close, contested games.
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 App State N L 11–34 11 68.1 -57.1 20.5% 0%
2 North Carolina H L 3–20 6.6 90.6 -84 16.4% 0%
3 Monmouth H 31.8 32 -0.2 54.1% 19.4%
4 Rice H L 17–28 16.6 60.7 -44.1 32% 5.3%
6 South Florida A L 26–54 2.4 96.5 -94.2 5.9% 0%
7 Army A L 7–24 5.7 85.7 -80 14.4% 0%
8 Temple H L 14–49 9.7 70 -60.3 24.1% 0%
9 North Texas H L 20–54 27.7 43.9 -16.2 43.4% 15.2%
11 East Carolina A L 22–48 2.6 94.6 -92 6.5% 0%
12 UTSA H L 7–28 9.9 83.8 -73.9 23.6% 1.3%
13 Georgia A L 3–35 3.4 90.1 -86.7 8.6% 0%
14 Tulane A L 0–27 2.9 95.3 -92.4 7.4% 0%
0W / 11G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 App State H L 11–34 0 0.24 -0.24 0 1 ✗ 0
0.24
2 North Carolina H L 3–20 0 0.9 -0.9 0 1 ✗ 0
0.9
4 Rice H L 17–28 0.18 0.18 +0 1 1 Tied
0.18
6 South Florida A L 26–54 0 3.78 -3.78 0 2 ✗ 0
1
7 Army A L 7–24 0 0.57 -0.57 0 1 ✗ 0
0.57
8 Temple H L 14–49 0.28 0.28 +0 1 1 Tied
0.28
9 North Texas H L 20–54 1.3 3.26 -1.96 2 5 ✗ 2
0.65
11 East Carolina A L 22–48 0 0.93 -0.93 0 1 ✗ 0
0.93
12 UTSA H L 7–28 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.92
13 Georgia A L 3–35 0 9.66 -9.66 0 3 ✗ 0
1
14 Tulane A L 0–27 0 1.1 -1.1 0 1 ✗ 0
1
0W / 11G 4 17