Wisconsin Composite Control — 2025

Wisconsin Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

37.9

Composite Rank: #112 • 4–8 (FBS games)

GC Score

#111 in FBS

GC Net

-35.6

Raw GC Net

GC Off

21.8

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

57.4

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

48.8

#107 in FBS

MC Net

-1.55

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.17

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Miami (OH) H	W 17–0	73.2	10.3	+62.9	74.2%	64.8%	✓
2	Middle Tennessee H	W 42–10	55.9	16.2	+39.7	70.2%	46.9%	—
3	Alabama A	L 14–38	5	85.4	-80.3	12.6%	0%	—
4	Maryland H	L 10–27	7.5	84.4	-76.9	17.7%	1.3%	—
6	Michigan A	L 10–24	13.2	59.5	-46.3	29.7%	1.4%	—
7	Iowa H	L 0–37	3.6	89.5	-85.9	8.9%	0%	—
8	Ohio State H	L 0–34	5.7	88.4	-82.7	14.2%	0%	—
9	Oregon A	L 7–21	10.9	62.9	-52.1	27.2%	0%	—
11	Washington H	W 13–10	38.1	32.6	+5.5	54.4%	26.4%	—
12	Indiana A	L 7–31	7.9	83.2	-75.3	19.8%	0%	—
13	Illinois H	W 27–10	75.1	9.2	+66	77.1%	70.5%	✓
14	Minnesota A	L 7–17	10.6	67.2	-56.6	26.5%	0%	—
4W / 12G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Miami (OH) H	W 17–0	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.41
2	Middle Tennessee H	W 42–10	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.34
3	Alabama A	L 14–38	0	12.54	-12.54	0	4	✗ 0	1
4	Maryland H	L 10–27	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
6	Michigan A	L 10–24	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
7	Iowa H	L 0–37	0	6.78	-6.78	0	3	✗ 0	1
8	Ohio State H	L 0–34	0	15.77	-15.77	0	4	✗ 0	1
9	Oregon A	L 7–21	0	3.82	-3.82	0	1	✗ 0	1
11	Washington H	W 13–10	1.94	1.94	+0	1	1	Tied	1
12	Indiana A	L 7–31	0	3.95	-3.95	0	1	✗ 0	1
13	Illinois H	W 27–10	2.52	0	+2.52	1	0	✓ +1	1
14	Minnesota A	L 7–17	0	1.07	-1.07	0	1	✗ 0	1
4W / 12G			—	—	—	2	15	—	—