Western Michigan Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
59
Composite Rank: #64  •  9–4 (FBS games)
GC Score
51.8
#60 in FBS
GC Net
-3.8
Raw GC Net
GC Off
31.6
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
35.3
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
66.1
#66 in FBS
MC Net
-0.44
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.36
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Michigan State A L 6–23 1.7 96.1 -94.5 4.2% 0%
2 North Texas H L 30–33 44.6 15.6 +29 63% 36.2%
3 Illinois A L 0–38 6.5 87.9 -81.4 16.3% 0%
4 Toledo H W 14–13 17.5 51.9 -34.4 37.8% 4.3%
5 Rhode Island H 73.3 13.4 +59.9 81.1% 74.1%
6 Massachusetts A W 21–3 54.9 25.9 +29 62.9% 46.1%
7 Ball State H W 42–0 87.3 4.2 +83.1 89.5% 85.8%
9 Miami (OH) A W 23–13 36.5 46.8 -10.3 44.1% 27.7%
10 Central Michigan H W 24–21 20.4 49.8 -29.4 41.8% 6.7%
12 Ohio H W 17–13 45.6 24.9 +20.7 59.6% 31.6%
13 Northern Illinois A W 35–19 46.3 42.5 +3.7 52.2% 41.4%
14 Eastern Michigan A W 31–21 58.8 28.5 +30.3 65.5% 59.2%
15 Miami (OH) N W 23–13 93.2 5.9 +87.3 85.3% 98.2%
1 Kennesaw State NPost W 41–6 98.8 1.2 +97.6 97% 100%
10W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Michigan State A L 6–23 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
2 North Texas H L 30–33 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.65
3 Illinois A L 0–38 0 5.04 -5.04 0 2 ✗ 0
1
4 Toledo H W 14–13 0 1.6 -1.6 0 1 ✗ 0
1
6 Massachusetts A W 21–3 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.01
7 Ball State H W 42–0 0.32 0 +0.32 3 0 ✓ +3
0.11
9 Miami (OH) A L 17–26 0 1.24 -1.24 0 3 ✗ 0
0.41
10 Central Michigan H W 24–21 0.47 0 +0.47 1 0 ✓ +1
0.47
12 Ohio H W 17–13 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.7
13 Northern Illinois A W 35–19 0.32 0.11 +0.21 3 1 ✓ +3
0.11
14 Eastern Michigan A W 31–21 1.44 0 +1.44 3 0 ✓ +3
0.48
15 Miami (OH) H W 23–13 0.41 0 +0.41 1 0 ✓ +1
0.41
1 Kennesaw State HPost W 41–6 0.62 0 +0.62 1 0 ✓ +1
0.62
9W / 13G 12 7