Vanderbilt Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
71.9
Composite Rank: #27  •  9–3 (FBS games)
GC Score
65.1
#32 in FBS
GC Net
+13.2
Raw GC Net
GC Off
44.8
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
31.6
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
78.7
#19 in FBS
MC Net
+0.37
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.42
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Charleston Southern H 95.6 2.5 +93.1 93.8% 97.7%
2 Virginia Tech A W 44–20 35.1 50.8 -15.8 46.7% 29%
3 South Carolina A W 31–7 66.3 11.5 +54.9 71.4% 55.4%
4 Georgia State H W 70–21 84.8 5 +79.9 90.3% 88.6%
5 Utah State H W 55–35 84.8 5 +79.8 93.7% 100%
6 Alabama A L 14–30 25.7 48.6 -22.9 38.6% 15.2%
8 LSU H W 31–24 67.3 14.8 +52.6 72.2% 67.9%
9 Missouri H W 17–10 37.6 17.5 +20.2 59.7% 27.2%
10 Texas A L 31–34 3.3 96.5 -93.3 8.1% 0%
11 Auburn H W 45–38 29.4 44.8 -15.4 45.3% 17.1%
13 Kentucky H W 45–17 87.1 4.7 +82.4 88.2% 84.6%
14 Tennessee A W 45–24 46.7 30.3 +16.4 58.6% 41.9%
1 Iowa NPost L 27–34 9.2 79.4 -70.2 22.9% 0%
9W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
2 Virginia Tech A W 44–20 4.51 1.13 +3.38 4 1 ✓ +4
1
3 South Carolina A W 31–7 1.97 0 +1.97 1 0 ✓ +1
1
4 Georgia State H W 70–21 1.2 0 +1.2 5 0 ✓ +5
0.24
5 Utah State H W 55–35 0.77 0 +0.77 4 0 ✓ +4
0.19
6 Alabama A L 14–30 0 9.4 -9.4 0 3 ✗ 0
1
8 LSU H W 31–24 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
9 Missouri H W 17–10 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
10 Texas A L 31–34 5.1 7.64 -2.54 2 3 ✗ 2
1
11 Auburn H W 45–38 2.42 2.42 +0 1 1 Tied
1
13 Kentucky H W 45–17 6.43 0 +6.43 4 0 ✓ +4
1
14 Tennessee A W 45–24 8.47 2.12 +6.35 4 1 ✓ +4
1
1 Iowa HPost L 27–34 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
9W / 12G 25 9