UAB Composite Control — 2025

UAB Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

32.5

Composite Rank: #122 • 3–8 (FBS games)

GC Score

22.8

#121 in FBS

GC Net

-40.8

Raw GC Net

GC Off

17.9

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

58.7

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

42.2

#121 in FBS

MC Net

-1.98

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.47

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Alabama State H	—	77.4	12.1	+65.3	84%	87.2%	—
2	Navy A	L 24–38	11	66.2	-55.2	27.5%	0%	—
3	Akron H	W 31–28	64.8	13.8	+51	71.6%	66.1%	—
4	Tennessee A	L 24–56	1.9	96.7	-94.8	4.8%	0%	—
6	Army H	L 13–31	12.6	70.1	-57.5	28.7%	3.3%	—
7	Florida Atlantic A	L 33–53	3.4	92.4	-89	8.5%	0%	—
8	Memphis H	W 31–24	61.4	11.9	+49.5	73.2%	54.1%	—
10	UConn A	L 19–38	8.7	85.1	-76.4	15.8%	6.9%	—
11	Rice A	L 17–24	15	66.5	-51.4	28.4%	0.7%	—
12	North Texas H	L 24–53	4.2	90.3	-86.1	10.5%	0%	—
13	South Florida H	L 18–48	17.2	65.8	-48.5	27.4%	7.6%	—
14	Tulsa A	W 31–24	29.9	33.8	-3.8	47.4%	13.1%	—
3W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
2	Navy A	L 24–38	0	0.59	-0.59	0	1	✗ 0	0.59
3	Akron H	W 31–28	0.21	0.21	+0	1	1	Tied	0.21
4	Tennessee A	L 24–56	0	6.35	-6.35	0	3	✗ 0	1
6	Army H	L 13–31	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.57
7	Florida Atlantic A	L 33–53	0.24	0.73	-0.49	1	3	✗ 1	0.24
8	Memphis H	W 31–24	1.1	0	+1.1	1	0	✓ +1	1
10	UConn A	L 19–38	0	2.39	-2.39	0	3	✗ 0	0.8
11	Rice A	L 17–24	0.18	0.18	+0	1	1	Tied	0.18
12	North Texas H	L 24–53	0	1.95	-1.95	0	3	✗ 0	0.65
13	South Florida H	L 18–48	1.89	9.44	-7.55	1	5	✗ 1	1
14	Tulsa A	W 31–24	0.56	0	+0.56	1	0	✓ +1	0.56
3W / 11G			—	—	—	6	20	—	—