Rutgers Composite Control — 2025

Rutgers Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

Composite Rank: #98 • 4–7 (FBS games)

GC Score

41.8

#88 in FBS

GC Net

-16.6

Raw GC Net

GC Off

27.8

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

44.4

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

48.2

#108 in FBS

MC Net

-1.59

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.65

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Ohio H	W 34–31	72.9	10.3	+62.6	74.3%	69.4%	✓
2	Miami (OH) H	W 45–17	80.6	6.8	+73.8	83.1%	76.8%	✓
3	Norfolk State H	—	94.1	3.9	+90.1	90.2%	95.4%	✓
4	Iowa H	L 28–38	30.4	28	+2.4	52.7%	17.5%	—
5	Minnesota A	L 28–31	37.3	26.2	+11.1	52.2%	25.5%	—
7	Washington A	L 19–38	36.3	46.9	-10.6	41.9%	24.7%	—
8	Oregon H	L 10–56	1.9	92.3	-90.4	3.6%	0%	—
9	Purdue A	W 27–24	14.3	70.6	-56.3	29.3%	3.5%	—
10	Illinois A	L 13–35	6.9	84.3	-77.4	17.2%	0%	—
11	Maryland H	W 35–20	56.3	26.5	+29.9	66.2%	54.3%	—
13	Ohio State A	L 9–42	6.9	85.6	-78.7	17.2%	0%	—
14	Penn State H	L 36–40	25.5	51.1	-25.6	42.7%	14.6%	—
4W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Ohio H	W 34–31	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.7
2	Miami (OH) H	W 45–17	1.24	0.41	+0.83	3	1	✓ +3	0.41
4	Iowa H	L 28–38	2.26	2.26	+0	1	1	Tied	1
5	Minnesota A	L 28–31	1.07	2.13	-1.06	1	2	✗ 1	1
7	Washington A	L 19–38	1.94	3.88	-1.94	1	2	✗ 1	1
8	Oregon H	L 10–56	0	19.1	-19.1	0	5	✗ 0	1
9	Purdue A	W 27–24	0.67	0.33	+0.34	2	1	✓ +2	0.33
10	Illinois A	L 13–35	2.52	7.56	-5.04	1	3	✗ 1	1
11	Maryland H	W 35–20	1.01	0	+1.01	1	0	✓ +1	1
13	Ohio State A	L 9–42	0	7.88	-7.88	0	2	✗ 0	1
14	Penn State H	L 36–40	2.6	2.6	+0	1	1	Tied	1
4W / 11G			—	—	—	11	18	—	—