2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
84.6
Composite Rank: #9
•
12–2
(FBS games)
GC Score
98.5
#2 in FBS
GC Net
+55.9
Raw GC Net
GC Off
72.1
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
16.2
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
70.8
#53 in FBS
MC Net
-0.14
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.11
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
GC > MC by 28 points.
Oregon dominated win probability (Game Control score: 98.5)
but generated fewer consecutive scoring sequences than expected (Momentum Control score: 70.8).
This profile suggests a team that controlled field position and clock without delivering many knockout scoring runs —
a suffocating, methodical style rather than explosive momentum swings.
Game Control
Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | GC Scores | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC Off | GC Allowed | GC Net | |||
| 1 | Montana State H | — | 99 | 0.3 | +98.7 |
| 2 | Oklahoma State H | W 69–3 | 98 | 1.7 | +96.3 |
| 3 | Northwestern A | W 34–14 | 78.3 | 8.5 | +69.8 |
| 4 | Oregon State H | W 41–7 | 82.6 | 6.7 | +76 |
| 5 | Penn State A | W 30–24 | 38.1 | 25.2 | +12.9 |
| 7 | Indiana HPost | L 22–56 | 23.5 | 41.5 | -18 |
| 8 | Rutgers A | W 56–10 | 92.3 | 1.9 | +90.4 |
| 9 | Wisconsin H | W 21–7 | 62.9 | 10.9 | +52.1 |
| 11 | Iowa A | W 18–16 | 55.3 | 15.9 | +39.4 |
| 12 | Minnesota H | W 42–13 | 94.1 | 2.9 | +91.2 |
| 13 | USC H | W 42–27 | 69 | 9.3 | +59.7 |
| 14 | Washington A | W 26–14 | 77.3 | 10.3 | +66.9 |
| 1 | James Madison HPost | W 51–34 | 93.4 | 3.3 | +90.1 |
| 1 | Texas Tech NPost | W 23–0 | 75.7 | 9.9 | +65.9 |
| 1 | Indiana NPost | L 22–56 | 2.9 | 95.5 | -92.6 |
| 12W / 14G | — | — | — | ||
Momentum Control
Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opponent-Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC Off | MC Def ↓ | MC Net | |||
| 2 | Oklahoma State H | W 69–3 | 1.7 | 0 | +1.7 |
| 3 | Northwestern A | W 34–14 | 3.42 | 1.14 | +2.28 |
| 4 | Oregon State H | W 41–7 | 2.6 | 0 | +2.6 |
| 5 | Penn State A | W 30–24 | 2.6 | 2.6 | +0 |
| 7 | Indiana H | L 20–30 | 0 | 7.9 | -7.9 |
| 8 | Rutgers A | W 56–10 | 8.42 | 0 | +8.42 |
| 9 | Wisconsin H | W 21–7 | 1.2 | 0 | +1.2 |
| 11 | Iowa A | W 18–16 | 0 | 2.26 | -2.26 |
| 12 | Minnesota H | W 42–13 | 2.13 | 0 | +2.13 |
| 13 | USC H | W 42–27 | 2.15 | 2.15 | +0 |
| 14 | Washington A | W 26–14 | 3.88 | 0 | +3.88 |
| 1 | James Madison HPost | W 51–34 | 2.24 | 2.24 | +0 |
| 1 | Texas Tech APost | W 23–0 | 0 | 0 | +0 |
| 1 | Indiana APost | L 22–56 | 0 | 15.81 | -15.81 |
| 12W / 14G | — | — | — | ||