Oklahoma State Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
33
Composite Rank: #120  •  0–11 (FBS games)
GC Score
15
#131 in FBS
GC Net
-50.8
Raw GC Net
GC Off
13
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
63.8
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
50.9
#103 in FBS
MC Net
-1.42
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.09
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
0%
When winning MC
MC > GC by 36 points. Oklahoma State generated strong consecutive scoring sequences (Momentum Control score: 50.9) but spent more time in contested win probability territory than their sequence count suggests (Game Control score: 15). This profile suggests a team that delivers explosive scoring runs but also plays in close, contested games.
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 UT Martin H 97 1.8 +95.1 95.5% 100%
2 Oregon A L 3–69 1.7 98 -96.3 4.2% 0%
4 Tulsa H L 12–19 10.5 78.4 -68 21.9% 2.9%
5 Baylor H L 27–45 11.5 72 -60.5 27.6% 1.3%
6 Arizona A L 13–41 4.1 93.4 -89.3 10.3% 0%
7 Houston H L 17–39 13.5 65.6 -52.1 24.9% 6.4%
8 Cincinnati H L 17–49 10 76.2 -66.2 22.4% 0%
9 Texas Tech A L 0–42 1.7 98.3 -96.6 4.3% 0%
10 Kansas A L 21–38 23.7 57.2 -33.5 30.9% 13.1%
12 Kansas State H L 6–14 33.9 40.1 -6.2 49.4% 24.2%
13 UCF A L 14–17 63.7 17.9 +45.8 64.3% 65.1%
14 Iowa State H L 13–20 12.9 67.3 -54.4 32.1% 0%
0W / 11G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
2 Oregon A L 3–69 0 11.46 -11.46 0 3 ✗ 0
1
4 Tulsa H L 12–19 0 1.68 -1.68 0 3 ✗ 0
0.56
5 Baylor H L 27–45 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
6 Arizona A L 13–41 0 1.36 -1.36 0 1 ✗ 0
1
7 Houston H L 17–39 0 6.38 -6.38 0 5 ✗ 0
1
8 Cincinnati H L 17–49 0 2.39 -2.39 0 1 ✗ 0
1
9 Texas Tech A L 0–42 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
10 Kansas A L 21–38 0 5.43 -5.43 0 4 ✗ 0
1
12 Kansas State H L 6–14 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
13 UCF A L 14–17 0 0.71 -0.71 0 1 ✗ 0
0.71
14 Iowa State H L 13–20 1.72 0 +1.72 1 0 ✓ +1
1
0W / 11G 1 18