Oklahoma Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
75.4
Composite Rank: #20  •  9–3 (FBS games)
GC Score
74.8
#19 in FBS
GC Net
+25.6
Raw GC Net
GC Off
48.6
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
23
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
76
#27 in FBS
MC Net
+0.2
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.84
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Illinois State H 82.1 5.8 +76.2 85.4% 78.5%
2 Michigan H W 24–13 90 7.2 +82.9 82.1% 96%
3 Temple A W 42–3 91.1 4.3 +86.7 89.2% 91.7%
4 Auburn H W 24–17 52.3 14.9 +37.4 65% 43.6%
6 Kent State H W 44–0 93 3.1 +90 92.4% 92.9%
7 Texas N L 6–23 27.3 46.6 -19.4 38.5% 2.7%
8 South Carolina A W 26–7 89.2 6.8 +82.4 82.9% 92.1%
9 Ole Miss H L 26–34 14.9 60.4 -45.4 33.7% 0.6%
10 Tennessee A W 33–27 42 36 +6 53.5% 35.8%
12 Alabama APost L 24–34 45.5 25.5 +20 54.7% 23.2%
13 Missouri H W 17–6 66.2 15.4 +50.8 73.7% 66.7%
14 LSU H W 17–13 31 29.8 +1.2 52.2% 17.3%
1 Alabama HPost L 24–34 37.2 43.4 -6.2 48.2% 34%
8W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
2 Michigan H W 24–13 0 2.27 -2.27 0 1 ✗ 0
1
3 Temple A W 42–3 1.14 0 +1.14 4 0 ✓ +4
0.28
4 Auburn H W 24–17 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
6 Kent State H W 44–0 0.59 0 +0.59 5 0 ✓ +5
0.12
7 Texas A L 6–23 0 2.55 -2.55 0 1 ✗ 0
1
8 South Carolina A W 26–7 1.97 0 +1.97 1 0 ✓ +1
1
9 Ole Miss H L 26–34 3.02 3.02 +0 1 1 Tied
1
10 Tennessee A W 33–27 6.35 2.12 +4.23 3 1 ✓ +3
1
12 Alabama A W 23–21 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
13 Missouri H W 17–6 1.89 0 +1.89 1 0 ✓ +1
1
14 LSU H W 17–13 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
1 Alabama HPost L 24–34 6.27 6.27 +0 2 2 Tied
1
9W / 12G 17 6