Ohio State Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally
2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
98.5
Composite Rank: #2  •  11–2 (FBS games)
GC Score
100
#1 in FBS
GC Net
+57.8
Raw GC Net
GC Off
73.2
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
15.4
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
97
#3 in FBS
MC Net
+1.56
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.67
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
90.9%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Texas H W 14–7 69.7 11.3 +58.3 71.7% 62.7%
2 Grambling H 99.2 0 +99.2 99.9% 100%
3 Ohio H W 37–9 82.7 7.7 +74.9 80.7% 83.1%
5 Washington A W 24–6 52.5 22.6 +29.9 62.7% 48.5%
6 Minnesota H W 42–3 75.5 9.3 +66.2 84% 76.4%
7 Illinois A W 34–16 96.5 2.2 +94.3 94.5% 100%
8 Wisconsin A W 34–0 88.4 5.7 +82.7 85.8% 88.6%
10 Penn State H W 38–14 86.4 6.9 +79.5 82.8% 87.5%
11 Purdue A W 34–10 69.7 11.2 +58.5 77.3% 68.1%
12 UCLA H W 48–10 93.6 3.8 +89.9 90.6% 97.1%
13 Rutgers H W 42–9 85.6 6.9 +78.7 82.8% 88.2%
14 Michigan A W 27–9 58.1 26.7 +31.4 65.3% 51.9%
15 Indiana N L 10–13 43.3 31.3 +12.1 56.2% 38.2%
1 Miami NPost L 14–24 18.3 69.9 -51.6 34.1% 13.4%
11W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 Texas H W 14–7 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
3 Ohio H W 37–9 2.8 0.7 +2.1 4 1 ✓ +4
0.7
5 Washington A W 24–6 3.88 0 +3.88 2 0 ✓ +2
1
6 Minnesota H W 42–3 4.26 0 +4.26 4 0 ✓ +4
1
7 Illinois A W 34–16 7.56 0 +7.56 3 0 ✓ +3
1
8 Wisconsin A W 34–0 4.81 0 +4.81 4 0 ✓ +4
1
10 Penn State H W 38–14 2.6 0 +2.6 1 0 ✓ +1
1
11 Purdue A W 34–10 1.34 0 +1.34 4 0 ✓ +4
0.33
12 UCLA H W 48–10 3.4 0 +3.4 3 0 ✓ +3
1
13 Rutgers H W 42–9 3.37 0 +3.37 2 0 ✓ +2
1
14 Michigan A W 27–9 4.54 2.27 +2.27 2 1 ✓ +2
1
15 Indiana H L 10–13 3.95 0 +3.95 1 0 ✓ +1
1
1 Miami HPost L 14–24 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
11W / 13G 30 2