Kentucky Composite Control — 2025

Kentucky Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

51.3

Composite Rank: #83 • 4–7 (FBS games)

GC Score

42.2

#87 in FBS

GC Net

-16

Raw GC Net

GC Off

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

60.4

#78 in FBS

MC Net

-0.81

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.62

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

66.7%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Toledo H	W 24–16	87.7	7.3	+80.5	81.8%	91.6%	✓
2	Ole Miss H	L 23–30	24.9	46.8	-21.9	44.2%	11.1%	—
3	Eastern Michigan H	W 48–23	95.4	3.8	+91.7	90.6%	98.8%	✓
5	South Carolina A	L 13–35	11.9	71.7	-59.8	19.3%	2.9%	—
6	Georgia A	L 14–35	4.8	92.3	-87.4	12.1%	0%	—
8	Texas H	L 13–16	17.9	50.8	-33	42.5%	2.5%	—
9	Tennessee H	L 34–56	5.9	90.8	-84.9	14.7%	0%	—
10	Auburn A	W 10–3	60.2	14.5	+45.7	63.8%	47.1%	✓
11	Florida H	W 38–7	72.8	9.3	+63.5	80.8%	69%	—
12	Tennessee Tech H	—	90.2	4	+86.2	90%	89.4%	✓
13	Vanderbilt A	L 17–45	4.7	87.1	-82.4	11.8%	0%	—
14	Louisville A	L 0–41	5	86.2	-81.2	12.5%	0%	—
4W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Toledo H	W 24–16	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
2	Ole Miss H	L 23–30	3.02	3.02	+0	1	1	Tied	1
3	Eastern Michigan H	W 48–23	1.92	0.48	+1.44	4	1	✓ +4	0.48
5	South Carolina A	L 13–35	1.97	0	+1.97	1	0	✓ +1	1
6	Georgia A	L 14–35	0	6.44	-6.44	0	2	✗ 0	1
8	Texas H	L 13–16	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
9	Tennessee H	L 34–56	2.12	4.24	-2.12	1	2	✗ 1	1
10	Auburn A	W 10–3	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	1
11	Florida H	W 38–7	5.85	0	+5.85	3	0	✓ +3	1
13	Vanderbilt A	L 17–45	0	10.42	-10.42	0	4	✗ 0	1
14	Louisville A	L 0–41	0	9.6	-9.6	0	5	✗ 0	1
4W / 11G			—	—	—	10	15	—	—