Kent State Composite Control — 2025

Kent State Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

20.2

Composite Rank: #135 • 4–7 (FBS games)

GC Score

19.5

#128 in FBS

GC Net

-45.1

Raw GC Net

GC Off

10.3

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

55.4

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

#135 in FBS

MC Net

-3.35

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.54

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

50%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Merrimack H	—	58.6	13	+45.6	68.3%	57.6%	—
2	Texas Tech A	L 14–62	1.9	95.3	-93.4	4.8%	0%	—
3	Buffalo H	L 28–31	53.2	28.3	+24.9	58.9%	51.8%	—
4	Florida State A	L 10–66	1.9	97.5	-95.6	4.7%	0%	—
6	Oklahoma A	L 0–44	3.1	93	-90	7.7%	0%	—
7	Massachusetts H	W 42–6	96.8	3.2	+93.7	92.1%	100%	✓
8	Toledo A	L 10–45	26.5	53.2	-26.7	32.9%	21%	—
9	Bowling Green H	W 24–21	23.9	58.7	-34.8	39.5%	14.5%	—
11	Ball State A	L 13–17	19.5	59.6	-40.1	35.7%	6%	—
12	Akron A	W 42–35	48	27.9	+20.1	59.5%	34.3%	—
13	Central Michigan H	L 16–28	9	81.6	-72.6	22.4%	0%	—
14	Northern Illinois A	W 35–31	22.9	53.8	-31	37.3%	2.8%	—
4W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
2	Texas Tech A	L 14–62	2.73	10.93	-8.2	1	4	✗ 1	1
3	Buffalo H	L 28–31	0.5	1	-0.5	1	2	✗ 1	0.5
4	Florida State A	L 10–66	0	9.21	-9.21	0	6	✗ 0	1
6	Oklahoma A	L 0–44	0	13.04	-13.04	0	5	✗ 0	1
7	Massachusetts H	W 42–6	0.03	0	+0.03	2	0	✓ +2	0.01
8	Toledo A	L 10–45	1.6	3.21	-1.61	1	2	✗ 1	1
9	Bowling Green H	W 24–21	0.07	0.07	+0	1	1	Tied	0.07
11	Ball State A	L 13–17	0.11	0	+0.11	1	0	✓ +1	0.11
12	Akron A	W 42–35	0.21	0.21	+0	1	1	Tied	0.21
13	Central Michigan H	L 16–28	0	0.95	-0.95	0	2	✗ 0	0.47
14	Northern Illinois A	W 35–31	0.11	0.11	+0	1	1	Tied	0.11
4W / 11G			—	—	—	9	24	—	—