Akron Composite Control — 2025

Akron Composite Control — 2025 | Punt & Rally

2025 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

33.5

Composite Rank: #119 • 4–7 (FBS games)

GC Score

30.6

#106 in FBS

GC Net

-30.9

Raw GC Net

GC Off

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

45.9

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

36.4

#128 in FBS

MC Net

-2.36

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.17

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Wyoming H	L 0–10	16.5	50.2	-33.7	41.3%	0%	—
2	Nebraska A	L 0–68	3.1	94.6	-91.5	7.9%	0%	—
3	UAB A	L 28–31	13.8	64.8	-51	28.4%	0.6%	—
4	Duquesne H	—	95.7	1.7	+94	95.7%	100%	✓
5	Toledo A	L 3–45	2	98	-95.9	5.1%	0%	—
6	Central Michigan H	W 28–22	60.6	15.9	+44.7	72.2%	53.9%	—
7	Miami (OH) H	L 7–20	15.4	55.7	-40.4	34.9%	4%	—
8	Ball State A	L 28–42	17.7	64.2	-46.5	29.1%	1.8%	—
9	Buffalo A	W 24–16	45.7	26.8	+19	55.9%	28.5%	—
11	Massachusetts H	W 44–10	94.9	4.2	+90.7	89.5%	98.7%	✓
12	Kent State H	L 35–42	27.9	48	-20.1	40.5%	19.3%	—
13	Bowling Green A	W 19–16	35.9	27.1	+8.8	51.2%	18.3%	—
4W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Wyoming H	L 0–10	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.57
2	Nebraska A	L 0–68	0	7.23	-7.23	0	7	✗ 0	1
3	UAB A	L 28–31	0.19	0.19	+0	1	1	Tied	0.19
5	Toledo A	L 3–45	0	4.81	-4.81	0	3	✗ 0	1
6	Central Michigan H	W 28–22	0.47	0	+0.47	1	0	✓ +1	0.47
7	Miami (OH) H	L 7–20	0	0.41	-0.41	0	1	✗ 0	0.41
8	Ball State A	L 28–42	0	0.11	-0.11	0	1	✗ 0	0.11
9	Buffalo A	W 24–16	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.5
11	Massachusetts H	W 44–10	0.03	0.01	+0.02	2	1	✓ +2	0.01
12	Kent State H	L 35–42	0.12	0.12	+0	1	1	Tied	0.12
13	Bowling Green A	W 19–16	0.07	0	+0.07	1	0	✓ +1	0.07
4W / 11G			—	—	—	6	15	—	—