Tulsa Composite Control — 2023

Tulsa Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally

2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

14.6

Composite Rank: #124 • 3–8 (FBS games)

GC Score

7.4

#124 in FBS

GC Net

-43.7

Raw GC Net

GC Off

13.6

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

57.3

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

21.8

#116 in FBS

MC Net

-1.76

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.49

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

66.7%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Arkansas-Pine Bluff H	—	62.3	26.1	+36.3	71.6%	61%	—
2	Washington A	L 10–43	5.3	90	-84.7	13.3%	0%	—
3	Oklahoma H	L 17–66	3.6	93.5	-89.9	8.9%	0%	—
4	Northern Illinois A	W 22–14	51.8	21.3	+30.4	61.6%	42.7%	—
5	Temple H	W 48–26	78.3	8.4	+69.9	82.1%	81.3%	—
6	Florida Atlantic A	L 17–20	10.2	80	-69.8	25.5%	0%	—
8	Rice H	L 10–42	6.2	87.4	-81.2	15.5%	0%	—
9	SMU A	L 10–69	2.5	96.5	-94	6.2%	0%	—
10	Charlotte H	L 26–33	62.1	16	+46.1	68%	58.1%	—
11	Tulane A	L 22–24	11.5	75.8	-64.4	28.7%	0%	—
12	North Texas H	L 28–35	17.8	53.9	-36.2	32.9%	6.3%	—
13	East Carolina A	W 29–27	25.8	38.5	-12.7	50.4%	5.4%	—
3W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
2	Washington A	L 10–43	0	2.62	-2.62	0	1	✗ 0	1
3	Oklahoma H	L 17–66	0	9.57	-9.57	0	4	✗ 0	1
4	Northern Illinois A	W 22–14	0.6	0	+0.6	1	0	✓ +1	0.6
5	Temple H	W 48–26	0.22	0	+0.22	3	0	✓ +3	0.07
6	Florida Atlantic A	L 17–20	0	0.45	-0.45	0	1	✗ 0	0.45
8	Rice H	L 10–42	0.52	1.05	-0.53	1	2	✗ 1	0.52
9	SMU A	L 10–69	0	9.11	-9.11	0	5	✗ 0	1
10	Charlotte H	L 26–33	0.14	0.14	+0	2	2	Tied	0.07
11	Tulane A	L 22–24	2.58	0	+2.58	2	0	✓ +2	1
12	North Texas H	L 28–35	0.58	0.58	+0	1	1	Tied	0.58
13	East Carolina A	W 29–27	0.62	0.62	+0	2	2	Tied	0.31
3W / 11G			—	—	—	12	18	—	—