Tulane Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally
2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
61.6
Composite Rank: #22  •  10–3 (FBS games)
GC Score
71.2
#13 in FBS
GC Net
+30.2
Raw GC Net
GC Off
52.3
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
22
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
52
#39 in FBS
MC Net
-0.09
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.05
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 South Alabama H W 37–17 88.3 6.7 +81.5 83.2% 87.3%
2 Ole Miss H L 20–37 32.6 38.3 -5.7 45.1% 21.2%
3 Southern Miss A W 21–3 88.6 6.1 +82.5 84.7% 87.5%
4 Nicholls H 90.3 4.6 +85.6 88.5% 90.4%
5 UAB H W 35–23 44 35.3 +8.7 52.5% 34%
7 Memphis A W 31–21 56.2 23.2 +32.9 64% 51.7%
8 North Texas H W 35–28 80.4 9 +71.5 77.6% 78.6%
9 Rice A W 30–28 83.1 9.1 +74 77.3% 79.3%
10 East Carolina A W 13–10 33.6 35 -1.4 51.3% 22.8%
11 Tulsa H W 24–22 75.8 11.5 +64.4 71.3% 70.3%
12 Florida Atlantic A W 24–8 84.4 6.4 +78 83.9% 82.8%
13 UTSA H W 29–16 64.6 11.5 +53 73.6% 61%
14 SMU H L 14–26 15.9 56 -40.2 31.8% 2.4%
1 Virginia Tech NPost L 20–41 16.3 55.9 -39.6 31.3% 0.7%
10W / 13G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 South Alabama H W 37–17 3.63 0 +3.63 3 0 ✓ +3
1
2 Ole Miss H L 20–37 0 2.35 -2.35 0 1 ✗ 0
1
3 Southern Miss A W 21–3 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.24
5 UAB H W 35–23 0.24 0.49 -0.25 1 2 ✗ 1
0.24
7 Memphis A W 31–21 2.39 2.39 +0 2 2 Tied
1
8 North Texas H W 35–28 0 0.58 -0.58 0 1 ✗ 0
0.58
9 Rice A W 30–28 1.05 0.52 +0.53 2 1 ✓ +2
0.52
10 East Carolina A W 13–10 0.31 0.31 +0 1 1 Tied
0.31
11 Tulsa H W 24–22 0 0.55 -0.55 0 2 ✗ 0
0.28
12 Florida Atlantic A W 24–8 0.9 0 +0.9 2 0 ✓ +2
0.45
13 UTSA H W 29–16 3.9 0 +3.9 3 0 ✓ +3
1
14 SMU H L 14–26 0 3.65 -3.65 0 2 ✗ 0
1
1 Virginia Tech HPost L 20–41 0 2.68 -2.68 0 2 ✗ 0
1
10W / 13G 14 14