Texas A&M Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally
2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
63.1
Composite Rank: #16  •  6–6 (FBS games)
GC Score
58.2
#30 in FBS
GC Net
+15.2
Raw GC Net
GC Off
44
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
28.8
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
68
#9 in FBS
MC Net
+0.78
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.51
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
83.3%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 New Mexico H W 52–10 86.5 5 +81.5 87.4% 83.1%
2 Miami A L 33–48 35.3 49.4 -14.1 40.2% 29.9%
3 UL Monroe H W 47–3 86.1 5.7 +80.3 85.7% 82.3%
4 Auburn H W 27–10 78 9.5 +68.5 76.2% 68.8%
5 Arkansas N W 34–22 69.5 12 +57.5 72.8% 67.1%
6 Alabama H L 20–26 24.5 43.2 -18.6 41.7% 10.5%
7 Tennessee A L 13–20 32.9 33.5 -0.6 50.2% 11.2%
9 South Carolina H W 30–17 59 18.2 +40.8 68.8% 57.1%
10 Ole Miss A L 35–38 15.8 64.9 -49.1 31.3% 6%
11 Mississippi State H W 51–10 77.4 8.1 +69.4 83.6% 79.7%
12 Abilene Christian H 62.3 12.9 +49.4 72% 57.9%
13 LSU A L 30–42 38.2 34.8 +3.4 50.4% 30.1%
1 Oklahoma State NPost L 23–31 9.2 77.2 -68 23% 0%
6W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
1 New Mexico H W 52–10 0.77 0 +0.77 4 0 ✓ +4
0.19
2 Miami A L 33–48 1.93 3.86 -1.93 1 2 ✗ 1
1
3 UL Monroe H W 47–3 0.38 0 +0.38 6 0 ✓ +6
0.06
4 Auburn H W 27–10 3.23 0 +3.23 2 0 ✓ +2
1
5 Arkansas A W 34–22 1.19 1.19 +0 1 1 Tied
1
6 Alabama H L 20–26 3.2 6.41 -3.21 1 2 ✗ 1
1
7 Tennessee A L 13–20 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
9 South Carolina H W 30–17 3.72 0 +3.72 3 0 ✓ +3
1
10 Ole Miss A L 35–38 2.35 2.35 +0 1 1 Tied
1
11 Mississippi State H W 51–10 3.89 0 +3.89 4 0 ✓ +4
0.97
13 LSU A L 30–42 7.91 0 +7.91 3 0 ✓ +3
1
1 Oklahoma State APost L 23–31 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
1
6W / 12G 26 6