Temple Composite Control — 2023

Temple Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally

2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

4.4

Composite Rank: #132 • 2–9 (FBS games)

GC Score

4.3

#131 in FBS

GC Net

-47.3

Raw GC Net

GC Off

14.5

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

61.8

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

4.6

#132 in FBS

MC Net

-2.7

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.16

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Akron H	W 24–21	24.4	60.8	-36.4	38.8%	13.7%	—
2	Rutgers A	L 7–36	8.3	81.6	-73.3	20.8%	0%	—
3	Norfolk State H	—	91.7	4.5	+87.2	88.7%	92.5%	✓
4	Miami H	L 7–41	5.1	86.1	-81	12.7%	0%	—
5	Tulsa A	L 26–48	8.4	78.3	-69.9	17.9%	0%	—
6	UTSA H	L 34–49	14.9	64.2	-49.3	27.3%	4%	—
7	North Texas A	L 14–45	7.9	82.6	-74.7	19.8%	0%	—
8	SMU H	L 0–55	4.7	84.9	-80.2	11.8%	0%	—
10	Navy H	W 32–18	86.5	7.2	+79.3	82%	85.1%	✓
11	South Florida A	L 23–27	21.3	72	-50.7	35.3%	20.6%	—
12	UAB A	L 24–34	49.7	28.4	+21.3	56.8%	46.5%	—
13	Memphis H	L 21–45	5.9	91.4	-85.5	14.8%	0%	—
2W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Akron H	W 24–21	0	0.08	-0.08	0	1	✗ 0	0.08
2	Rutgers A	L 7–36	0	5.8	-5.8	0	5	✗ 0	1
4	Miami H	L 7–41	0	5.8	-5.8	0	3	✗ 0	1
5	Tulsa A	L 26–48	0	0.83	-0.83	0	3	✗ 0	0.28
6	UTSA H	L 34–49	0	1.3	-1.3	0	1	✗ 0	1
7	North Texas A	L 14–45	0	1.16	-1.16	0	2	✗ 0	0.58
8	SMU H	L 0–55	0	9.11	-9.11	0	5	✗ 0	1
10	Navy H	W 32–18	0.58	0.29	+0.29	2	1	✓ +2	0.29
11	South Florida A	L 23–27	0.93	0.93	+0	2	2	Tied	0.47
12	UAB A	L 24–34	0	0.24	-0.24	0	1	✗ 0	0.24
13	Memphis H	L 21–45	0	1.2	-1.2	0	1	✗ 0	1
2W / 11G			—	—	—	4	25	—	—