Florida Atlantic Composite Control — 2023

Florida Atlantic Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally

2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

32.3

Composite Rank: #85 • 3–8 (FBS games)

GC Score

27.3

#91 in FBS

GC Net

-20.6

Raw GC Net

GC Off

24.9

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

45.5

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

37.4

#74 in FBS

MC Net

-0.9

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.32

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Monmouth H	—	92.2	4.7	+87.5	88.4%	93.8%	✓
2	Ohio H	L 10–17	26.7	43.8	-17.1	41.5%	14.9%	—
3	Clemson A	L 14–48	2.5	95.9	-93.3	6.3%	0%	—
4	Illinois A	L 17–23	31.9	45.1	-13.3	45.3%	23.7%	—
6	Tulsa H	W 20–17	80	10.2	+69.8	74.5%	78.8%	✓
7	South Florida A	W 56–14	87.8	5.8	+82.1	85.6%	85.3%	✓
8	UTSA H	L 10–36	10.3	73	-62.7	22.5%	0%	—
9	Charlotte A	W 38–16	78.2	8.1	+70.2	81.7%	80%	—
10	UAB A	L 42–45	20	54.5	-34.5	36.4%	10.3%	—
11	East Carolina H	L 7–22	9.7	81.6	-72	24.2%	0%	—
12	Tulane H	L 8–24	6.4	84.4	-78	16.1%	0%	—
13	Rice A	L 21–24	27.4	39.4	-12	45.2%	11.7%	—
3W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
2	Ohio H	L 10–17	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.86
3	Clemson A	L 14–48	0	3.72	-3.72	0	2	✗ 0	1
4	Illinois A	L 17–23	0.83	0.83	+0	1	1	Tied	0.83
6	Tulsa H	W 20–17	0.28	0	+0.28	1	0	✓ +1	0.28
7	South Florida A	W 56–14	0.93	0	+0.93	2	0	✓ +2	0.47
8	UTSA H	L 10–36	0	1.3	-1.3	0	1	✗ 0	1
9	Charlotte A	W 38–16	0.07	0.07	+0	1	1	Tied	0.07
10	UAB A	L 42–45	0.49	0.49	+0	2	2	Tied	0.24
11	East Carolina H	L 7–22	0	0.31	-0.31	0	1	✗ 0	0.31
12	Tulane H	L 8–24	0	2.58	-2.58	0	2	✗ 0	1
13	Rice A	L 21–24	0	0.52	-0.52	0	1	✗ 0	0.52
3W / 11G			—	—	—	7	11	—	—