Eastern Michigan Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally
2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
28.9
Composite Rank: #93  •  5–7 (FBS games)
GC Score
38.7
#70 in FBS
GC Net
-7.4
Raw GC Net
GC Off
32.4
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
39.8
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
19.2
#121 in FBS
MC Net
-1.9
Raw MC Net
MC Off
0.32
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
100%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Howard H 82.8 9.5 +73.3 76.2% 81.8%
2 Minnesota A L 6–25 12.2 64.6 -52.4 30.5% 0%
3 Massachusetts H W 19–17 39.4 27.2 +12.2 48.9% 18.7%
4 Jacksonville State A L 0–21 7.1 81 -74 17.6% 0%
5 Central Michigan A L 23–26 28.8 32.4 -3.6 49.4% 11.2%
6 Ball State H W 24–10 64.4 14.7 +49.7 66.2% 47.7%
7 Kent State H W 28–14 70.2 15.7 +54.5 66% 53.9%
8 Northern Illinois A L 13–20 36.3 21.8 +14.5 55.7% 21.3%
9 Western Michigan H L 21–45 4.6 87.1 -82.6 11.4% 0%
11 Toledo A L 23–49 3.9 91 -87.1 9.7% 0%
12 Akron H W 30–27 11.4 61.8 -50.4 27.8% 0.7%
13 Buffalo A W 24–11 86.7 6.7 +80 83.2% 87.6%
1 South Alabama HPost L 10–59 90.2 4.3 +86 89.3% 88.5%
5W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
2 Minnesota A L 6–25 0 0.92 -0.92 0 1 ✗ 0
0.92
3 Massachusetts H W 19–17 0.17 0 +0.17 1 0 ✓ +1
0.17
4 Jacksonville State A L 0–21 0 0.95 -0.95 0 1 ✗ 0
0.95
5 Central Michigan A L 23–26 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.13
6 Ball State H W 24–10 0.25 0 +0.25 1 0 ✓ +1
0.25
7 Kent State H W 28–14 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.01
8 Northern Illinois A L 13–20 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.6
9 Western Michigan H L 21–45 0 0.44 -0.44 0 2 ✗ 0
0.22
11 Toledo A L 23–49 1.28 5.14 -3.86 1 4 ✗ 1
1
12 Akron H W 30–27 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.08
13 Buffalo A W 24–11 0.25 0 +0.25 1 0 ✓ +1
0.25
1 South Alabama HPost L 10–59 0 6.05 -6.05 0 5 ✗ 0
1
5W / 12G 4 13