East Carolina Composite Control — 2023

East Carolina Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally

2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

21.7

Composite Rank: #112 • 1–10 (FBS games)

GC Score

16.5

#113 in FBS

GC Net

-33.1

Raw GC Net

GC Off

17.9

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

26.9

#103 in FBS

MC Net

-1.48

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.28

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Michigan A	L 3–30	0.2	97.2	-97	0.6%	0%	—
2	Marshall H	L 13–31	23.7	42.3	-18.6	40.8%	11.2%	—
3	App State A	L 28–43	31.2	43	-11.8	44.4%	22.7%	—
4	Gardner-Webb H	—	88.9	4.6	+84.3	88.5%	87.7%	✓
5	Rice A	L 17–24	16.8	53.6	-36.8	37.9%	0%	—
7	SMU H	L 10–31	10.2	79.9	-69.7	25.4%	0%	—
8	Charlotte H	L 7–10	12.5	70.6	-58.1	31.2%	0%	—
9	UTSA A	L 27–41	9.4	73.6	-64.2	21.4%	0.6%	—
10	Tulane H	L 10–13	35	33.6	+1.4	48.7%	20.5%	—
11	Florida Atlantic A	W 22–7	81.6	9.7	+72	75.8%	82.2%	✓
12	Navy A	L 0–10	10	78.7	-68.7	25.1%	0%	—
13	Tulsa H	L 27–29	38.5	25.8	+12.7	49.6%	8.1%	—
1W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Michigan A	L 3–30	0	12.85	-12.85	0	3	✗ 0	1
2	Marshall H	L 13–31	0.53	1.58	-1.05	1	3	✗ 1	0.53
3	App State A	L 28–43	0	1.21	-1.21	0	1	✗ 0	1
5	Rice A	L 17–24	0.52	0.52	+0	1	1	Tied	0.52
7	SMU H	L 10–31	0	1.82	-1.82	0	1	✗ 0	1
8	Charlotte H	L 7–10	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.07
9	UTSA A	L 27–41	0	1.3	-1.3	0	1	✗ 0	1
10	Tulane H	L 10–13	1.29	1.29	+0	1	1	Tied	1
11	Florida Atlantic A	W 22–7	0.45	0	+0.45	1	0	✓ +1	0.45
12	Navy A	L 0–10	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.29
13	Tulsa H	L 27–29	0.55	0.55	+0	2	2	Tied	0.28
1W / 11G			—	—	—	6	13	—	—