Central Michigan Composite Control — 2023

Central Michigan Composite Control — 2023 | Punt & Rally

2023 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control

Composite Score

24.1

Composite Rank: #106 • 4–7 (FBS games)

GC Score

#110 in FBS

GC Net

-31.5

Raw GC Net

GC Off

21.5

SOS-Adj Offense

GC Allowed

52.9

Avg Allowed ↓

MC Score

30.2

#97 in FBS

MC Net

-1.3

Raw MC Net

MC Off

0.42

Adj. Sequences

MC Win%

100%

When winning MC

Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Scores			Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
Wk	Opponent	Result	GC Off	GC Allowed	GC Net	Avg WP%	Ctrl%	Never Trailed
1	Michigan State A	L 7–31	16.3	64.3	-48	29.9%	9.8%	—
2	New Hampshire H	—	70.5	11.7	+58.8	71.4%	60.9%	✓
3	Notre Dame A	L 17–41	7.3	83.9	-76.6	18.3%	0%	—
4	South Alabama A	W 34–30	41.9	35	+6.9	54.8%	35.9%	—
5	Eastern Michigan H	W 26–23	32.4	28.8	+3.6	50.6%	14.2%	—
6	Buffalo A	L 13–37	6.5	87.9	-81.4	16.2%	0%	—
7	Akron H	W 17–10	35.7	39.5	-3.8	45.3%	24.1%	—
8	Ball State A	L 17–24	11.3	71	-59.7	25.9%	0%	—
10	Northern Illinois H	W 37–31	81.8	8.9	+72.9	77.7%	75.7%	✓
11	Western Michigan A	L 28–38	20.3	65.9	-45.5	32.3%	13.7%	—
12	Ohio A	L 20–34	11.1	75.1	-64	27.7%	0%	—
13	Toledo H	L 17–32	11	63.2	-52.2	27.6%	0%	—
4W / 11G			—	—	—	—	—	—

Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opponent-Adjusted			Raw		Edge	Opp Wt
Wk	Opponent	Result	MC Off	MC Def ↓	MC Net	Off	Def ↓	Edge	Opp Wt
1	Michigan State A	L 7–31	0	1.19	-1.19	0	2	✗ 0	0.59
3	Notre Dame A	L 17–41	0	8.04	-8.04	0	3	✗ 0	1
4	South Alabama A	W 34–30	1.21	1.21	+0	1	1	Tied	1
5	Eastern Michigan H	W 26–23	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.46
6	Buffalo A	L 13–37	0	0.49	-0.49	0	2	✗ 0	0.25
7	Akron H	W 17–10	0.08	0	+0.08	1	0	✓ +1	0.08
8	Ball State A	L 17–24	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.25
10	Northern Illinois H	W 37–31	1.81	0.6	+1.21	3	1	✓ +3	0.6
11	Western Michigan A	L 28–38	0.44	0.44	+0	2	2	Tied	0.22
12	Ohio A	L 20–34	0	0	+0	0	0	Tied	0.86
13	Toledo H	L 17–32	0	2.57	-2.57	0	2	✗ 0	1
4W / 11G			—	—	—	7	13	—	—