Toledo Composite Control — 2021 | Punt & Rally
2021 Composite Control — Game Control + Momentum Control
Composite Score
71.2
Composite Rank: #30  •  6–6 (FBS games)
GC Score
65.4
#35 in FBS
GC Net
+14.5
Raw GC Net
GC Off
40.1
SOS-Adj Offense
GC Allowed
25.6
Avg Allowed ↓
MC Score
77
#24 in FBS
MC Net
+0.31
Raw MC Net
MC Off
1.31
Adj. Sequences
MC Win%
66.7%
When winning MC
Game Control Game-by-Game Win Probability Log
Wk Opponent Result GC Scores Avg WP% Ctrl% Never Trailed
GC Off GC Allowed GC Net
1 Norfolk State H 98.3 0.1 +98.2 99.7% 100%
2 Notre Dame A L 29–32 16.4 72.3 -55.8 22.8% 3%
3 Colorado State H L 6–22 43.9 42.5 +1.3 57.3% 59.9%
4 Ball State A W 22–12 81.2 9.7 +71.5 76.6% 91.2%
5 Massachusetts A W 45–7 96.3 0.9 +95.4 97.9% 100%
6 Northern Illinois H L 20–22 41.7 33.2 +8.5 61% 41.5%
7 Central Michigan A L 23–26 11.4 77.4 -66 28% 0.6%
8 Western Michigan H W 34–15 55 18.6 +36.4 65.4% 40.4%
10 Eastern Michigan H L 49–52 47.4 41.2 +6.2 52.2% 52%
11 Bowling Green A W 49–17 96.1 2.8 +93.3 93% 100%
12 Ohio A W 35–23 82.6 4.6 +78 90.1% 95.4%
13 Akron H W 49–14 96.3 0.7 +95.5 98.1% 100%
1 Middle Tennessee NPost L 24–31 50.7 29.3 +21.5 58.3% 59.9%
6W / 12G
Momentum Control Game-by-Game Scoring Sequences Log
Wk Opponent Result Opponent-Adjusted Raw Edge Opp Wt
MC Off MC Def ↓ MC Net Off Def ↓
2 Notre Dame A L 29–32 4.99 2.5 +2.49 2 1 ✓ +2
1
3 Colorado State H L 6–22 0.85 1.69 -0.84 1 2 ✗ 1
0.85
4 Ball State A W 22–12 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.39
5 Massachusetts A W 45–7 0 0 +0 2 0 ✓ +2
0
6 Northern Illinois H L 20–22 0 0 +0 0 0 Tied
0.58
7 Central Michigan A L 23–26 1.87 0.93 +0.94 2 1 ✓ +2
0.93
8 Western Michigan H W 34–15 0 1.04 -1.04 0 1 ✗ 0
1
10 Eastern Michigan H L 49–52 0.55 1.1 -0.55 1 2 ✗ 1
0.55
11 Bowling Green A W 49–17 1.38 0.34 +1.04 4 1 ✓ +4
0.34
12 Ohio A W 35–23 0.38 0 +0.38 1 0 ✓ +1
0.38
13 Akron H W 49–14 0.16 0 +0.16 3 0 ✓ +3
0.05
1 Middle Tennessee HPost L 24–31 0.75 0.75 +0 1 1 Tied
0.75
6W / 12G 17 9